The recent news of Lewis Hamilton signing with Ferrari has sparked intense debate and controversy in the racing world. The union of the most successful driver on the grid with the largest and most iconic team has raised questions about the potential benefits and drawbacks of this partnership. As the second contact between Hamilton and the Maranello factory begins, signs of a strange decision are already emerging.
Unconventional Testing
Hamilton had planned to carry out a second test in Barcelona, but what was not expected was the car he would be driving. Instead of using an outdated version, Hamilton will be behind the wheel of a more recent car, similar to the one that will compete for the crown in 2025. This has sparked controversy, as it is not usual for a driver to get into a car from last season. The reason behind this decision is a request from Pirelli to test its 2026 tires, which will be reduced in width and weight, and will have less grip.
Past Controversies
Pirelli has been involved in controversies before, such as in 2013 when they allowed Mercedes to use their car from the same year in development in Montmeló. This led to a change in the team’s dynamic in the following races, and the FIA had to punish them by preventing them from participating in a rookie test.
More Controversy…
In addition to the testing controversy, there is more. Johnny Herbert, a driver from the nineties and current driver-commissioner within the FIA, has expressed his preference for Hamilton, stating that winning would be the ideal scenario. This has raised eyebrows, as it is unusual for a voice from the federation to openly show bias.
That (Hamilton) won would be the ideal scenario
Johnny Herbert
Herbert’s comments are especially surprising given his role in the controversial sanction of Fernando Alonso in the last Australian Grand Prix. Alonso was deemed responsible for erratic driving after a contact with George Russell, a decision that was widely debated.