Justice Rejected Appeal Over Unworthy Prison Conditions and Limited Rights

Background of the Case

The case of Martín Mutio, who was sentenced to 15 years in prison for his involvement in the shipment of 4.5 tons of cocaine to Hamburg, has been under scrutiny due to concerns about his conditions of seclusion. Mutio is currently serving his sentence in Unit 25 of the National Institute of Rehabilitation (INR), a maximum-security prison.

Conditions of Seclusion

Mutio’s lawyers raised an action questioning the conditions of seclusion, citing inadequate patio hours and limited access to phone use as examples of unworthy treatment. However, the INR presented evidence, including photos and videos, to demonstrate that the conditions of Mutio’s imprisonment are worthy within the context of the Uruguayan prison system.

Evidence Presented

The evidence presented by the INR included photographs of Mutio’s departures to the patio and his telephone records, as well as the established work plan. Additionally, it was noted that conversations have been held with Mutio to consider his proposals for adding more hours of work, such as painting tasks in the visitation room.

Testimony of a Qualified Witness

Juan Miguel Petit, the parliamentary commissioner for the prison system, testified as a qualified witness, having reviewed the conditions in Unit 25. He noted the progress made from initial human rights violations to the current situation of dignified conditions within the prison system.

Decision and Appeal

The narcotic prosecutor, Rodrigo Morosoli, recommended maintaining the seclusion regime, taking into account the progressivity of the prison system and UN standards. Judge Diavanet Olivera decided to maintain the current seclusion regime, and Mutio’s defense has appealed the decision, which will be resolved by an appeals court.

Read Also:  Trump Links Democratic Policies to Recent Accident Involving Disabled Workers

Recent Articles

Related News

Leave A Reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here