One of the hottest debates these days with fans of the series Amazon prime, The Boys, is whether the Protective could measure up to Superman. Comparisons are natural, The protector is a parody of the man of steel, with equivalent powers. Obviously, the difference lies in the fact that the Man of Steel uses his powers to do good, unlike the “Protector” with the tendencies of true sociopath, which leads us to wonder when will he decimate the planet. .
The question, although we should never have the answer on our screens, is: How would the confrontation end if these two entities killed each other? In an interview with The Illuminerdi, the showrunner of The Boys, Eric Kripke, conceded that he had a little idea on the subject. According to him, The protector has a clear advantage over its counterpart because he has no moral code, unlike the Man of Steel. While Superman could hold back, The Protector wouldn’t hold back his punches, and could take advantage of that.
I mean it’s definitely The Protector because Superman has a moral and Homelander (The Protector) is like a hardcore sociopath. So Homelander has no problem snatching Superman’s coui ***************************** Where Superman wouldn’t strike below the belt. There is no real match
With regard to the declaration of‘Eric Kripke, it seems obvious that his knowledge of the Man of Steel is quite limited. What do you think of this fight, if it were to take place one day?