The statements were made by one of the top figures in Microsoft technology, in the person of Brad Smith, its president. Faced with one of the greatest forces of transformation and innovation in the world, how should States regulate or act against Artificial Intelligence?
Currently, the importance of AI is undeniable, as well as its capabilities that are not always used for good. For this reason, the executive came to present his vision of the need (or lack thereof) in the regulation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Europe.
The opinion of the president of Microsoft on the governance of AI in Europe
It was at the end of the week that Brad Smith, Chairman of Microsoft, delivered the keynote address for the event, “Europe’s Digital Transformation: Embracing the AI ​​Opportunity,” in Brussels. There, he discussed Microsoft’s approach to responsible AI development, as well as its governance in Europe.
During the event, Microsoft highlighted five points to govern AI in Europe. Here, in line with the debates on the EU AI Law, one of the largest regulatory efforts in the Union in recent years.
North American technology supports the construction of this regulatory base to effectively address security and defend fundamental rights. In practice, while enabling innovations that will ensure Europe’s global competitiveness.
Evaluate and “weigh” well the impact of AI on everyday life in Europe
Microsoft supports and subscribes to international efforts to develop a voluntary AI Code of Conduct. Instrument capable of bringing together public and private partners for the implementation of non-binding international standards on AI transparency.
Something that also manages risks and other technical requirements for companies that develop and implement AI systems.
For the different requirements associated with AI governance to work internationally, a multilateral framework with the ability to link different national laws will be needed.
Thus, something that guarantees that an AI system certified as safe in one jurisdiction can also be considered as safe in another geography.
In summary, Microsoft believes that an international code should:
- Build on work already done at the OECD to develop principles for trustworthy AI.
- Provide means for regulated AI developers to vouch for the security of these systems against internationally agreed standards.
- Promote innovation and access by providing means for mutual recognition of cross-border compliance and security.
Finally, we can also see the statements in question during the initiative “Europe’s digital transformation: Embracing the AI ​​opportunity” in Brussels.