Putin’s historical review with Tucker Carlson raises claims of Chinese nationalism over Vladivostok

The extensive “history lesson” in which he Wladimir Putin In his controversial interview with Tucker Carlson, the former Fox News host turned spearhead of the anti-globalist international, has led some Chinese nationalists to demand the return of the port city of Vladivostok in the Russian Far East, which is washed by the Pacific Ocean. The Putin interview hashtag became a trending topic on Weibo. On the Chinese social media platform, similar to Facebook, hundreds of profiles linked to the sector have scrutinized the Russian president’s words about Russia-Ukraine relations, which he used to support his failed attempt to annex the country. wanted to justify. An invasion that Beijing has not condemned.

And China has a historic claim to Vladivostok. The city that houses the largest Russian port in the PacificIt was handed over to Tsarist Russia in 1860. under the Treaty of Aigun, which established the border between the two countries along the Amur and Ussuri rivers. Since then, two of China’s three northeastern provinces, Heilongjiang and Jilin, have been inland.

In recent years, a movement has emerged in China that is one of the most nationalist sectors in the country asks for the restoration of the enclave. These demands have resurfaced in the wake of Putin’s monologue with Carlson, in which he contrasted the alleged historical founding of the Russian state, which he said dates back to the 9th century, with the “invention” of Ukraine in the 20th century.

“According to history, Russia should return to us Vladivostok and the vast territory that was stolen about 100 years ago,” wrote Robert Wu, a Chinese user, on the social network X, formerly Twitter. Beijing has officially banned the use of the platform Elon Musk in China, but internet users use a virtual private network (VPN) to access it without restrictions. In this sense, another Chinese nationalist recalled that Russia has territories previously controlled by the Chinese imperial dynasties. “Furthermore, present-day Mongolia and Russian Siberia were areas of China in the Tang Dynasty with the capital Xi’an,” he wrote on Weibo. The Tang Dynasty dates back to the 7th century.

Read Also:  A man produces alcohol in his body due to a rare syndrome

Other Chinese experts expressed skepticism about Putin’s use of historical references in the interview. “Historically, a place belonging to a place can mean very little. Why should we refer to the 8th or 13th century but not 220 BC? BC? We live in the present with laws, not in the 8th century,” wrote Zichen Wang, a member of the Chinese Center on China and Globalization and a former journalist for Chinese state media, on his X account.

In August 2023, a map released by China’s Ministry of Natural Resources identified additional areas under dispute with Russia and neighboring countries. These included Bolshoi Ussuriysky Island, or Heixiazi, at the confluence of two border rivers, ownership of which is legally shared between the two countries. China’s official map listed the entire strategic area of ​​350 square kilometers as its easternmost territory. Previous versions of the map had also renamed important locations in eastern Russia. Vladivostok was renamed Haishenwai and Sakhalin Island was renamed Kuyedao.

Chinese state media has remained silent on the Vladivostok issue. And Beijing views the Kremlin’s support as a bulwark to combat American influence in international affairs. Moscow, for its part, has been forced to increase its dependence on the Asian giant over the past two years to avoid sanctions imposed over its aggression against Ukraine. Despite historical disputes, the leaders of China and Russia, Xi Jinping And Wladimir Putinannounced two years ago the “boundless friendship” between the two nations.

“Chinese experts pointed out that the American conservatives represented by Carlson have a kind of resistance and prejudice against China that stems from their ideology. “President Putin’s statements, based on an objective, deep and accurate understanding of Chinese diplomacy, are helpful in correcting the biased understanding of China and reassuring the concerns of Western societies about China’s peaceful development,” said a Beijing resident Expert told the pro-government party Global Times on condition of anonymity.

Recent Articles

Related News

Leave A Reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here