In Cangas they throw toads out of their mouths after the arbitration last Sunday against Sinfín de Santander, and which ended in a tie at 23. Beyond the errors in the interpretation of the fouls in attack, in which the Galician team always felt on disadvantage, what they are claiming is what the club interprets as a flagrant error due to ignorance of the rules, it occurs with half a minute to go, when after getting ahead (23-22), the Sinfín put the ball into play, it turns out that a local player throws himself to recover the ball, and the referees, after commenting on the performance, exclude the Cantabrian, and give possession to the Cantabrian team that manages to tie.
The Cangas interprets that Basualdo puts the ball in play in the center of the track, nobody catches him and Golden Mario (home winger) picks him up in the center of the track. And that’s where the controversy comes into play. The Galician club considers that the ball is theirs, and Sinfín protests because it is an action that conditions the serve, and therefore it is exclusion and ball. And that’s what the referees decide..
Now Cangas claims and sends the considerations to that action to the Competition Committee, the commented rule of the EHF, and from there, and of the cases that have occurred in France due to arbitration errors due to ignorance of the rulesin which minutes have had to be repeated in many games, requests that the last half minute be played and with a free kick in his favor. Curiously, in a flagrant error by the referees in a Cangas-Guadalajara match, the request from Alcarria was considered, and a match from which they were defeated was given a tie on the Canguesa court.